프로이트 [영15] [정신분석입문] (Introductory Lectures on Psycho-Analysis) 발췌 (2)

Part II Dreams

(83) the study of dreams is not only the best preparation for the study of the neuroses, but dreams are themselves a neurotic symptom, which, moreover, offers us the priceless advantage of occurring in all healthy people.

(85) doctors have observed cases in which mental disease has started with a dream and in which a mental disease has started with a dream and in which a delusion originating in the dream has persisted. . . .

(90) We experience every sort of thing in dreams and believe in it, whereas nevertheless we experience nothing except, perhaps, the single disturbing stimulus.

(96) It may be that the external and internal stimuli, too, impinging on the sleeper, are only the instigators of the dream and will accordingly betray nothing to us of its essence.

(101) For I can assure you that it is quite possible, and highly probable indeed, that the dreamer does know what his dream means: only he does not know that he knows it and for that reason thinks he does not know it.

(109) The Zurich school, led by Bleuler and Jung, found the explanation of the reactions that followed in the association-experiment by getting the subjects to throw light on their reactions by means of subsuquent associations, if those reactions had shown striking features. It then turned out that these striking reactions were determined in the most definite fashion by the subject's complexes. In this manner Bleuler and Jung built the first bridge from experimental psychology to psycho-analysis. (자유연상 기법의 출발에 대한 중요한 지적.)

(120) manifest dream-content / latent dream-thoughts

We will describe what the dream actually tells us as the manifest dream-content, and the concealed material, whic we hope to reach by pursuing the ideas that occur to the dreamer, as the latent dream-thoughts.

(121) When you consider that the manifest dream is made up predominantly of visual images and more rarely of thoughts and words, you can imagine what importance attaches to this kind of relation in the construction of dreams.  [Hallucinations]

(128) dream-distortion is not part of the essential nature of dreams. [왜곡이 별로 없는 어린아이의 꿈을 생각해 볼 때.]

(129) We think we should have slept more soundly if there had been no dream, but we are wrong; in fact, without the help of the dream we should not have slept at all.

(129) What instigates a dream is a wish, and the fulfilment of that wish is the content of the dream -- this is one of the chief characteristics of dreams. 

(136) Dreams are things which get rid of (psychical) stimuli disturbing to sleep, by the method of hallucinatory satisfaction.

(142) These wishes, which are censored and given a distorted ｅxpression in dreams, are first and foremost manifestations of an unbridled and ruthless egoism.

(145) one must be humble and hold back one's sympathies and antipathies if one wants to discover what is real in this world. [이 이하 내용도 주목할 필요가 있음]

(146) What does psycho-analysis do here but confirm Plato's old saying that the good are those who are content to dream of what the others, the bad, really do.

(147) We lay a stronger emphasis on what is evil in men only because other people disavow it and thereby make the human mind, not better, but incomprehensible. If now we give up this one-sided ethical valuation, we shall undoubtedly find a more correct formula for the relation between good and evil in human nature.